{"id":345,"date":"2007-08-22T21:42:35","date_gmt":"2007-08-22T20:42:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/?p=345"},"modified":"2012-10-20T21:37:14","modified_gmt":"2012-10-20T19:37:14","slug":"pritomny-okamzik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/?p=345","title":{"rendered":"P\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fd okam\u017eik"},"content":{"rendered":"

R. Rohr <\/em><\/p>\n

P\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fd okam\u017eik nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou konkurenci. Nenastal nikdy v minulosti a nestane se znovu v budoucnosti. Nem\u00e1me \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd z\u00e1klad pro srovn\u00e1n\u00ed. Kdy\u017e sout\u011b\u017e\u00edm, nemiluji. Nemohu se dostat k tomu, abych miloval, proto\u017ee hled\u00e1m nov\u00fd zp\u016fsob, jak dominovat. Tento druh my\u0161len\u00ed nen\u00ed tou pravdou, kter\u00e1 \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee B\u016fh k n\u00e1m takto nep\u0159ich\u00e1z\u00ed. Mystici, ti, kdo se skute\u010dn\u011b modl\u00ed, toto v\u011bd\u00ed. Ti, kdo hluboce vstupuj\u00ed do velk\u00e9ho tajemstv\u00ed, nezakou\u0161ej\u00ed Boha, kter\u00fd srovn\u00e1v\u00e1, d\u011bl\u00e1 rozd\u00edly a soud\u00ed. Zakou\u0161ej\u00ed Boha v\u0161eobj\u00edmaj\u00edc\u00edho p\u0159ij\u00edmaj\u00edc\u00edho, kter\u00fd hled\u00ed na Bo\u017e\u00ed obraz v n\u00e1s a t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 odm\u00edt\u00e1 hled\u011bt na jeho opak. Juli\u00e1na z Norwiche, moje obl\u00edben\u00e1 u\u010ditelka mystiky, \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 nap\u0159\u00edklad: \u201eP\u00e1n hled\u00ed na sv\u00e9 slu\u017eebn\u00edky s \u00fatrpnost\u00ed a nevin\u00ed je. V Bo\u017e\u00edch o\u010d\u00edch nepad\u00e1me: v na\u0161ich o\u010d\u00edch nestoj\u00edme. Oboj\u00ed je pravdiv\u00e9; ale hlub\u0161\u00ed vhled pat\u0159\u00ed Bohu.“ (Revelations of Divine Love, k. 82).<\/p>\n

Je to podobn\u00e9 tomu, jak zach\u00e1z\u00edme s vlastn\u00edmi d\u011btmi, p\u0159inejmen\u0161\u00edm kdy\u017e jsou mal\u00e9 a mil\u00e9. Nevn\u00edm\u00e1me nep\u0159\u00edjemnosti, kter\u00e9 n\u00e1m zp\u016fsobuj\u00ed. Opakujeme si jako mantru: \u201eJe to moje d\u00edt\u011b.“ Jsou j\u00e1. M\u00e1m tak r\u00e1d jejich pravdu. Vid\u00edm s\u00e1m sebe v jejich o\u010d\u00edch, v jejich sm\u00edchu, dokonce i v jejich nejhor\u0161\u00edch \u010dinech. Nemohu je odm\u00edtnout, proto\u017ee jsou j\u00e1. Zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee takto miluje B\u016fh to, co stvo\u0159il.
\nPokud jsme pln\u011b p\u0159\u00edtomni, nedos\u00e1hli jsme toho svou hlavou. P\u0159\u00edtomna je cel\u00e1 bytost. Nau\u010dili jsme se to v ran\u00e9m d\u011btstv\u00ed, ale \u0161kola to z n\u00e1s asi odstranila. Psychologov\u00e9 nyn\u00ed tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee n\u011bco takov\u00e9ho jako nemluvn\u011b vlastn\u011b neexistuje. Je pouze nemluvn\u011b s matkou. V prvn\u00edch p\u00e1r letech jsou jedno, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm ze strany d\u00edt\u011bte. Zd\u00e1 se mu, \u017ee se zcela zrcadl\u00ed v rodi\u010dovsk\u00fdch o\u010d\u00edch, zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b mat\u010din\u00fdch. V\u011b\u0159\u00edme tomu, co n\u00e1m jej\u00ed o\u010di o n\u00e1s \u0159\u00edkaj\u00ed a st\u00e1v\u00e1me se t\u00edm. Je to hra zrcadlen\u00ed. Modlitba je pr\u00e1v\u011b takov\u00e1: p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed a navracen\u00ed Bo\u017e\u00edho pohledu.<\/p>\n

Jak\u00e1 to musela b\u00fdt \u00faleva \u017e\u00edt d\u0159\u00edve, ne\u017e bylo zrcadlo a fotografie. Kdy\u017e se vyd\u00e1te do zem\u00ed t\u0159et\u00edho sv\u011bta, do d\u017eungl\u00ed, lid\u00e9 se velmi r\u00e1di fotografuj\u00ed. Ale stav\u011bj\u00ed se p\u0159ed fotoapar\u00e1t \u00fapln\u011b jinak ne\u017e my. Vid\u011bli jste to. Kdy\u017e se fotografujeme my, zat\u00e1hneme b\u0159icho a usm\u00edv\u00e1me se. To oni ned\u011blaj\u00ed. Nesm\u011bj\u00ed se. D\u00edvaj\u00ed se v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Obvykle stoj\u00ed vzp\u0159\u00edmeni, jsou form\u00e1ln\u00ed a v\u00e1\u017en\u00ed. Jejich t\u011blo je takov\u00e9, jak\u00e9 je – pr\u00e1v\u011b tam, darov\u00e1no v\u00e1m. Nepro\u017eili cel\u00fd sv\u016fj \u017eivot prohl\u00ed\u017een\u00edm fotografi\u00ed tak jako my.<\/p>\n

Ego je dualistou uvnit\u0159 n\u00e1s sam\u00fdch. \u201eJe zvykem,“ \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 James Carse, \u201evid\u011bt sebe sama nad jin\u00fdm a proti n\u011bmu.“ Pr\u00e1v\u011b po tom ego tou\u017e\u00ed. Proto\u017ee ego, moje bohatstv\u00ed, moje inteligence, moje mor\u00e1ln\u00ed kvality, moje postaven\u00ed ve spole\u010dnosti jsou t\u00edm, \u010d\u00edm jsou, jenom v kontrastu s osobou vedle mne. Tich\u00fd st\u0159ed, prav\u00e9 j\u00e1, se nestav\u00ed proti ni\u010demu a nepot\u0159ebuje se proti n\u011b\u010demu stav\u011bt, rozli\u0161ovat, porovn\u00e1vat se. Proto m\u016f\u017ee \u017e\u00edt z tohoto prvotn\u00edho kinestetick\u00e9ho pozn\u00e1n\u00ed. Do t\u00e9 m\u00edry, jak je na\u0161e du\u0161e pln\u00e1 \u017eivota, jsme spokojeni s dostate\u010dnost\u00ed p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00e9ho okam\u017eiku; jsme proto v kontaktu se skute\u010dnost\u00ed.
\nTo, \u017ee \u017eijeme ze sv\u00e9ho ega, n\u00e1s odd\u011bluje od na\u0161eho t\u011bla. Boj\u00edme se t\u011bla a velmi jsme ochudili k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00e9 u\u010den\u00ed o sexualit\u011b. Je tomu tak t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 ve v\u0161ech k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00fdch c\u00edrkv\u00edch. Mysl\u00edm, \u017ee d\u016fvodem, pro\u010d jsme vykonali na t\u011ble tak hrozn\u00e9 d\u00edlo, je to, \u017ee jsme podlehli t\u00e9to z\u00e1kladn\u00ed chyb\u011b rozli\u0161en\u00ed. Proto tak\u00e9 tolik z n\u00e1s, zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b mu\u017ei, neznaj\u00ed sv\u00e9 pocity. Nev\u011bd\u011bli jsme ani, \u017ee na nich z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed. Posunuli jsme se do onoho z\u00e1kladn\u00edho rozd\u011blen\u00ed a potla\u010dili sv\u00e9 pocity, obvykle v z\u00e1jmu vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdkonnosti a dosa\u017een\u00ed \u00fasp\u011bchu. Nane\u0161t\u011bst\u00ed jsme sou\u010dasn\u011b ob\u011btovali n\u00e1bo\u017eenskou citlivost. Ted‘ vypad\u00e1 jako cosi ciz\u00edho, um\u011bl\u00e9ho a dokonce iracion\u00e1ln\u00edho.
\nZbav\u00edme-li se sv\u00e9ho kinestetick\u00e9ho pozn\u00e1n\u00ed, jsme v\u00fdkonn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. M\u016f\u017eeme st\u00e1le tlumit pocity a pokra\u010dovat v tom, co je t\u0159eba vykonat v p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00ed hodin\u011b. Jsou chv\u00edle, kdy je to zcela na m\u00edst\u011b, dokonce vhodn\u00e9 a nutn\u00e9. Ale nen\u00ed tomu tak v\u017edycky. Jako du\u0161e ve skute\u010dnosti nejedn\u00e1me. Jsme. Jako ego zvl\u00e1d\u00e1me sv\u011bt. M\u011bn\u00edme ho. Upravujeme ho a st\u00e1le se sna\u017e\u00edme ho zlep\u0161it. Jako kontempluj\u00edc\u00ed se pt\u00e1me, co sv\u011bt \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 od n\u00e1s. Bd\u00edme.<\/p>\n

Pleteme si je s \u00faplnou skute\u010dnost\u00ed, ale soukrom\u00e9 j\u00e1 je bezesporu iluze. M\u016fj \u017eivot nevypr\u00e1v\u00ed o mn\u011b. Proto je Bible soci\u00e1ln\u00ed histori\u00ed. Jsme sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed mnohem v\u011bt\u0161\u00edho tajemstv\u00ed. Neberte tuto svoji soukromou z\u00e1le\u017eitost tak v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Prvotn\u00ed filozofick\u00fd a duchovn\u00ed probl\u00e9m Z\u00e1padu je le\u017e individualismu. Individualismus t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 znemo\u017e\u0148uje c\u00edrkev. T\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 znemo\u017e\u0148uje spole\u010denstv\u00ed. T\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 znemo\u017e\u0148uje soucit. S t\u00edm vlastn\u00edm j\u00e1 jsme to p\u0159ehnali. Stalo se to \u201ena\u0161\u00ed jedinou hrou“, i kdy\u017e u\u017e to \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 hra nen\u00ed. Pot\u0159ebuji poznat, \u017ee jsem v \u0159ece, kter\u00e1 je v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017eli jsem j\u00e1. Z\u00e1kladem a proudem t\u00e9 \u0159eky je l\u00e1ska. \u017divot nen\u00ed mou z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed, je z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed Boha, a B\u016fh se t\u00fdk\u00e1 l\u00e1sky. Nezn\u00e1me-li l\u00e1sku, neza\u017e\u00edv\u00e1me-li l\u00e1sku, za\u017e\u00edv\u00e1me-li jenom nejistotu a k\u0159ehkost sv\u00e9ho mal\u00e9ho j\u00e1, st\u00e1v\u00e1me se neklidn\u00fdmi.
\nSt\u00e1v\u00e1me se dokonce neurval\u00fdmi a nen\u00e1vistn\u00fdmi, proto\u017ee nev\u011bdom\u00ed v\u00ed: \u201etohle nen\u00ed to, co jsem\u201c a \u201etohle nen\u00ed to, co jsme\u201c. Chceme na to za\u00fato\u010dit. Ta zu\u0159ivost, zloba a nespokojenost se velmi roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159ily mezi lidmi na Z\u00e1pad\u011b. Projevuje se v izolovan\u00fdch jedinc\u00edch, kte\u0159\u00ed vyt\u00e1hnou zbra\u0148 a st\u0159\u00edlej\u00ed. Sekularismus je osam\u011bl\u00fd, zoufal\u00fd projekt. Nem\u016f\u017eeme \u017e\u00edt izolovan\u00fd \u017eivot s negativn\u00edmi odsudky a n\u00e1siln\u00fdmi my\u0161lenkami ve sv\u00fdch srdc\u00edch. Protestujeme, \u017ee podle t\u011bchto my\u0161lenek nejedn\u00e1me. Probl\u00e9m je v tom, \u017ee ony jednaj\u00ed v n\u00e1s. Nech\u00e1vaj\u00ed n\u00e1s odd\u011blen\u00e9, izolovan\u00e9, a proto fale\u0161n\u00e9 ve vztahu k sob\u011b sam\u00fdm a nakonec i vztah k druh\u00fdm. V kontemplaci se dost\u00e1v\u00e1me do jin\u00e9ho prostoru, kde vid\u00edme iluzi odd\u011blenosti. Za\u017e\u00edv\u00e1me to, co sestra Paula Gonzalez nazvala \u201ej\u00e1 obalen\u00e9 polopropustnou membr\u00e1nou\u201c. Doch\u00e1z\u00ed k mnoh\u00e9mu proud\u011bn\u00ed skrze tuto membr\u00e1nu – ob\u011bma sm\u011bry – a tohoto proud\u011bn\u00ed si mus\u00edme za\u010d\u00edt v\u0161\u00edmat.
\nTibetsk\u00e9 slovo pro identitu znamen\u00e1 \u201evydr\u017eet ve sv\u00e9m j\u00e1“. St\u00e1le se sna\u017e\u00edme vytvo\u0159it sv\u00e9 j\u00e1 a vydr\u017eet v n\u011bm jako v dan\u00e9 identit\u011b a ochran\u011b p\u0159ed podv\u011bdom\u00edm. C\u00edt\u00edm se tak p\u00e1nem v\u0161eho, nad\u0159azen\u00fdm, spr\u00e1vn\u00fdm, ale je to v\u0161echno vytvo\u0159eno p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm n\u00e1mi samotn\u00fdmi na z\u00e1klad\u011b toho, co o sob\u011b v\u00edme. Skl\u00e1d\u00e1 se to z toho, co m\u00e1me a nem\u00e1me na sob\u011b r\u00e1di, z podv\u011bdom\u00fdch part\u016f, kter\u00e9 znovu a znovu p\u0159ehr\u00e1v\u00e1me. Sna\u017e\u00edme se b\u00fdt t\u00edm, co kdosi nazval \u201ekdosi p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00fd\u201c. Chceme b\u00fdt n\u011bk\u00fdm p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00fdm, zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b v\u016f\u010di sob\u011b. To nen\u00ed tak \u00fapln\u011b \u0161patn\u011b. S lidmi, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00ed, se p\u0159\u00edjemn\u011b pracuje.<\/p>\n

Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 v\u0161ak pou\u017eil obrazu d\u00edt\u011bte, aby n\u00e1s u\u010dil \u201emysli za\u010d\u00e1te\u010dn\u00edka“. Pr\u00e1v\u011b d\u00edt\u011b nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou identitu ega, kterou by dokazovalo, prom\u00edtalo, chr\u00e1nilo. Kdo nep\u0159ijme Bo\u017e\u00ed kr\u00e1lovstv\u00ed jako d\u00edt\u011b, ten do,; n\u011bj nevstoup\u00ed. Ale mal\u00e9 d\u011bti si je\u0161t\u011b svoji identitu nechr\u00e1n\u00ed. Pozn\u00e1vaj\u00ed kinesteticky a reaguj\u00ed na to, co je, ne na to, co by m\u011blo nebo mohlo b\u00fdt. Proto tolik k\u0159i\u010d\u00ed a pi\u0161t\u00ed radost\u00ed. Rodi\u010de se mohou zbl\u00e1znit, to je mi jasn\u00e9. Proto ale tak\u00e9 m\u016f\u017ee nastat okam\u017eit\u00e9 blaho. Jen se pod\u00edvejte, jak pi\u0161t\u00ed. Kdy\u017e vid\u00ed zv\u00ed\u0159\u00e1tko, nemus\u00ed to filtrovat sv\u00fdm rozumem a ov\u011b\u0159ovat, zda je maj\u00ed r\u00e1di. Ani se neptaj\u00ed, zda je to nebezpe\u010dn\u00e9. Pod\u00edvejte na t\u0159\u00ed- nebo \u010dty\u0159let\u00e9 d\u00edt\u011b, kter\u00e9 uvid\u00ed n\u011bco nov\u00e9ho. Okam\u017eit\u011b d\u00e1 kinesteticky najevo k\u0159ikem: \u201eL\u00edb\u00ed se mi to.“ Je to hezk\u00e9, nov\u00e9, vzru\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed. K\u00e9\u017e bychom dok\u00e1zali p\u0159ij\u00edmat skute\u010dnost tak bezprost\u0159edn\u011b a spont\u00e1nn\u011b, bez \u00fasudk\u016f a kalkulac\u00ed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

R. Rohr P\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fd okam\u017eik nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou konkurenci. Nenastal nikdy v minulosti a nestane se znovu v budoucnosti. Nem\u00e1me \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd z\u00e1klad pro srovn\u00e1n\u00ed. Kdy\u017e sout\u011b\u017e\u00edm, nemiluji. Nemohu se dostat k tomu, abych miloval, proto\u017ee hled\u00e1m nov\u00fd zp\u016fsob, jak dominovat. Tento druh my\u0161len\u00ed nen\u00ed tou pravdou, kter\u00e1 \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee B\u016fh k n\u00e1m takto nep\u0159ich\u00e1z\u00ed. Mystici, ti, kdo […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4869,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions\/4869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cestanahoru.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}